Zukunftsregion Westpfalz

Evaluator

ISM - Institute for Social Pedagogic Research Mainz., Mainz, GERMANY

Type/classification

Green economy

Contact details of the main implementing body

Name of the organisation, original language

Zukunftsregion Westpfalz

Name of the organisation, English translation

Future Region West Palatinate

SECTION A - DESCRIPTION OF THE GOOD PRACTICE

Name of the practice, original language

Zukunftsregion Westpfalz

Country

Germany

Description of the practice

521000 inhabitants are living in the region of West Palatinate. The Pfäzler forest are one of the largest woodland in Germany. But it is not only an agriculture and foresty region. The city of Kaiserslautern has an university and technology center, especially for the ICT sector.

Due to the many demographic changes and the economic structure it is very important to preserve the qualified employees in the region.
Therefore the association tries to realize projects, which one partner could not realize by his own but in coorperation with the others.

Policy context

The association (or project) covers different stakeholders: owners, politicians, functionaries, public servants, chambers or people from the region. All of them have the same objective: to foster the development of their region.

 

The association is a plattform for all of them and stimulates different projects. The owners and politicians are coming from different municipalities and counties- and from different political parties.

Labour market context

The demographic change is one of the greatest challenges during the next years. The population will decrease and at the same time ageing of the population will happen. Therefore it is important to recruit new personal and to preserve the qualified employees in the region.

Activities

There are different acitivities. But all of them want to show how attractive the region is. The first column/pillar focuses at the labour market. The transition from school to the labour market for young people leaving in the region and to climb the social ladder for potential qualified employees.
The second column/pillar focuses at the quality of life and competitiveness of the economy. The association tries to illustrate the different and interesting aspects and offers, which the region provides, i.e. cultural and free time events.

The third column/pillar focuses at the idea of networking. The association brings together all the different stakeholders in order to cooperate for the same idea: to make the region stronger.

Management and operation

It is an association with their own staff.

Target groups/beneficiaries

Qualified employees (from EU and Non-EU Member States, too), young people, owners.

Start date

Value not entered

End date (actual or planned)

Value not entered

Gender dimension

The association is planning a project to arrange work and life balance. Keyword: family-friendly workplace.

Products involved in or resulting from the practice

They have started a project in order:
-to find out the future demand of qualified employees
-to match the future demand with the offer of the Vocational Training and the degrees of the university
-to inform the training centers and the professionals about the future needs and skill profils
-to avoid the abruption of vocational trainings

They have developed a free APP, which shows young people all of the spare-time acitivities in the area
The region offers free WIFI in the whole “future area”

They have designed the region into an attravtice landscape with many offers such as cultural industries, a rich regional art scene etc.

Outcomes of the practice (planned/expected and actual)

– finding out and matching the future demand of qualified employees

Source of funding

Regional budget (tax revenue), Local/municipal budget (tax revenue)

Main responsible body, type

Local/regional body or authority other than Chamber of Commerce or PES. Please specify

Role of implementing body

-initiators

Other bodies involved in implementation of the practice as partners or contractors

-universities
-regionals institutions
-coorporations

Evaluation - Was the practice evaluated?

Yes, external evaluation

SECTION B - CLASSIFICATION OF PRACTICE

Target group(s)

Not targeted

Employers

Value not entered

Jobseekers

Value not entered

People seeking training

Value not entered

B.2 Type of practice

B.2.1 Practices related to management or servicing of clients

Registration, skill assessments, identification of client needs and matching

Value not entered

B.2.2 Practices related to labour market information and improvement of micro and smes’ procedures

Labour market information (LMI)

Value not entered

Micro and SMEs’ procedures

Value not entered

B.2.3 Practices related to skill mismatch reduction

Supports aimed at reducing skill mismatch (targeted to unemployed or employed)

Value not entered

Supports aimed at reducing skill mismatch: labour mobility

Value not entered

Sharing the cost of training and skills development

Value not entered

B.3 Delivery method(s)

Delivery methods involved

Value not entered

B.4 Contracting out

Extent of contracting out of practice: The service is contracted out…

Value not entered

Type of subcontractor(s)

Value not entered

B.5 Partnership

Type of partners involved in implementation of the practice

Value not entered

SECTION C - Information about evaluation of the practice

When was the practice evaluated?

Value not entered

Type of organisation carrying out the evaluation

Value not entered

Details of the organisation responsible for carrying out the evaluation

Name of the organisation, original language/Name of the evaluator

Value not entered

Name of the organisation, English translation

Value not entered

E mail

Value not entered

Web page

Value not entered

Overall evaluation methodology/methodology

Value not entered

Indicators in the evaluation

Value not entered

Main findings of the evaluation

Value not entered

Change in practice following evaluation

Value not entered

C.1 Documentation of the evaluation

Type of documentation

Value not entered

Reference

Value not entered

Monitoring evidence

Value not entered

SECTION D - PRACTICE CRITERIA

D.1 - Evidence of results

Value not entered

D.2 - Relevance

Value not entered

D.3 - Availability of clear and adequate information

Value not entered

D.4 - Impact

Value not entered

D.5 - Innovation

Value not entered

D.6 - Broad-based participation

Value not entered

D.7 - Sustainability

Value not entered

D.8 - Mainstreaming

Value not entered

D.9 - European Added Value and Transferability

Value not entered

D.10 - Additional comments

Value not entered

Reviews

Value not entered

search icon

Search best practice

Best practices archive >>>

newsletter icon

Newsletter

Subscribe to the newsletter of Project Nemesis to stay updated on our news.

Subscribe >>>

send best practice icon

Submit best practice

Experience is maybe the most significant asset to ensure competence transfer and practice sharing. By submitting a good practice in the fields of interest of the NeMESI project, you are helping us growing the project community and – hopefully – business chances for SMEs in the ICT and Green Economy sectors.

Enter the form >>>

E-Guide

 eguide for smes

The main project product is an eGuide, that has been conceived to help SMEs better identify skill needs and realize a profitable skills matching, by exploiting information, good practices and recommendations.

Get the eGuide >>>